Nursing homework help

Exceeds expectations

Very well considered case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and comprehensively presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction is clearly defined.

Meets Expectations

Well considered case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and thoroughly presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction is clearly defined.

Meets Expectations

Good case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and clearly presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction lacks some clarity.

Satisfactory

Satisfactory case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction lacks some detail or depth.

Unsatisfactory

Unsatisfactory case study. The child/family circumstances are not clearly presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction lacks clarity/detail making it difficult for the reader to conceptualise the situation.

Exceeds expectations

Exemplary achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy and comprehensive consideration of health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience.

Meets Expectations

High achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy and thorough consideration of health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience.

Meets Expectations

Good achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy and fair consideration of health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience; may lack depth detail in some aspects.

Satisfactory

Satisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy, health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience may be limited; further depth in response/consideration would have increased marks.

Unsatisfactory

Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating inaccuracy and inadequacy regarding prevalence data and/or health outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood experience; further depth in response/consideration would have increased marks.

Exceeds expectations

Exemplary achievement against this criterion, demonstrating sophisticated insight into the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2.

Meets Expectations

High achievement against this criterion, demonstrating well considered insight into the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2.

Meets Expectations

Good achievement against this criterion, demonstrating some insight into the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2.

Satisfactory

Satisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating sufficient understanding of the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child identified in criteria 2; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark.

No Marks

Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the impact of family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study.

Exceeds expectations

Exemplary achievement against this criterion, demonstrating sophisticated examination of the possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study.

Meets Expectations

High achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a thorough examination of the possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study.

Meets Expectations

Good achievement against this criterion, demonstrating well considered possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study.

Satisfactory

Satisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a sufficient understanding of the possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark.

Unsatisfactory

Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study.

Exceeds expectations

Exemplary achievement against this criterion, outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing.

Meets Expectations

High achievement against this criterion, outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing.

Meets Expectations

Good achievement against this criterion, outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing.

Satisfactory

Satisfactory achievement against this criterion, outlining some therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing; but may be somewhat generic.

Unsatisfactory

Unsatisfactory achievement against this criteria, therapeutic engagement strategies may be absent or inconsistent with/inappropriate for the family/child situation as outlined in the case study; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study.

Exceeds expectations

Exemplary achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions are clearly articulated and thoroughly justified. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are specific to the needs of the child/family in the case.

Meets Expectations

High achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales are clearly articulated. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are specific to the needs of child/family in the case.

Meets Expectations

Good achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales suggested. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are relevant to the needs of the child/family but may not address the most pressing priorities as objectively presented in the case.

Satisfactory

Satisfactory achievement against this criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales suggested. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are relevant to the needs of the child/family but are more generic rather than specific to the situation.

Unsatisfactory

Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion. Nursing actions are absent or demonstrate a lack of understanding regarding prioritization of care needs in relation to the presented case; discussion may be general rather than specific to the situation presented in the case study.

Exceeds expectations

Exemplary achievement against this criterion, a very well informed paper utilizing high quality evidence

Meets Expectations

High achievement against this criterion, a very well informed paper

Meets Expectations

Good achievement against this criterion; a well informed paper that would benefit from further reading an research in some areas or some different choices of evidence

Satisfactory

Satisfactory achievement against this criterion; a paper that is accurate in its content but lacks depth in some areas or relies on evidence that is variable in quality. Further reading and research would have improved achievement against this criterion

Unsatisfactory

This paper does not draw on sufficient reliable, contemporary of relevant theory or literature to present an informed position. Further reading, research and effort to integrate evidence into discussion would have improved achievement against this criterion

Exceeds expectations

Excellent essay structure that is logical, clear, and sophisticated in its development. Professional terminology is used throughout. No errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. APA 7th referencing style is used, no referring errors in text or reference list. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%.

Meets Expectations

Very good essay structure. Occasional errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. Minor editing and revision required. APA 7th referencing style is used, minor errors in intext citations and/or reference list. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%.

Meets Expectations

Good essay structure. Some errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling, limited editing and revision required. APA 7th referencing style is used, some errors in intext citations and/or reference list. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%.

Satisfactory

Adequate essay structure. Consistent errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling which detract from the clarity of the work, however key points are still adequately communicated to the reader. Significant editing and revision required to improve the academic quality of the work. APA 7th referencing style is used inconsistently, with errors. Adheres to the Word limit +/- 10%.

Unsatisfactory

Poor essay structure, errors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling detract significantly from the clarity of the writing so that ideas and understanding of concepts cannot be communicated clearly to the reader. Thorough editing and revision is required to achieve satisfactorily in this criteria. Incorrect application of APA 7th edition referencing style resulting in inadequate acknowledgement of sources and risk of breaching academic integrity/plagiarism. Word count not adhered to.